This ideology of deregulation was no more sacrosanct than in financial markets. Yet, the problem with giving the finance markets a free hand has been an unprecedented necessity for expensive and difficult government intervention to rescue the mistakes and disasters of unbridled free markets.
The Dot Com Bubble of 2000-01. You might have thought the Dot Com bubble would have sent warning signals about the irrationality of financial speculators. But, it was just seen as an unfortunate, one off event. The US government reacted by doing everything it could to avoid any problem. Interest rates were slashed to 1% - thereby sowing the seeds for the next boom and bust in housing. - A classic case of Moral Hazard.
Sub Prime Mortgage Debt. Remember the days when mortgage lending was backed by deposits and you actually had to prove a decent income. US mortgage salesman working for bonuses sold mortgages to all and sundry. The consequence was an unprecedented rise in mortgage defaults. Yet, the whole banking system seems to have not taken much concern about the level of risks. This toxic subprime debt was happily bought by banks around the world - rather ironically, transforming high risk debt into supposedly A+ safe loans. The fall out from the Credit crunch has led to many banks going bankrupt or needing a bailout.
Victims of Credit Crunch so Far
- Subprime mortgage companies filing for bankruptcy - New Century Financial, Net Bank, American Home Mortgages, American Freedom Homes e.t.c.
- Bear Sterns gets bought for $2 a share, with backing from government
- Merrill Lynch sold to Bank of America over fears of cash shortage
- Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae - nationalised by US Government
- Lehman Brothers - bankrupt
- AIG Insurance - required $85 billion loan from US government
- House builders in UK and US suffering grave difficulties.
- Northern Rock - ran out of funds required rescuing by Government
- HBOS - target of short sellers, needed unprecedented takeover by Lloyds TSB breaking up competition commission rules.
Government Intervention in Markets
- Government loans to banks in trouble
- Nationalisation of key banks like Freddie Mac
- New regulations to stop 'short selling'
- Governments pumping money into financial markets.
- Tax cuts to try reflationary stimulus. - Economic Stimulus Pact only partially successful.
- 31 March 2008 Sweeping range of regulatory changes gives the Federal Reserve the right to regulate financial institutions and intervene in financial crisis.
- New regulation on non-depository banks
- New regulations on mortgage lending
2 comments:
I see a problem with this statement:
" Yet, the problem with giving the finance markets a free hand has been an unprecedented necessity for expensive and difficult government intervention to rescue the mistakes and disasters of unbridled free markets."
Government intervention is not necessary because it reprieves the moral hazard. Corporations must be held responsible for their mistakes the same way individuals are. Smaller companies with sound financial policies will then thrive.
However large corporations both inside and outsider the finance sector are actually "too big to fail". The invisible hand allows agency problems to function in full flow, management (ceos) continually lining the their pockets, taking huge risks to do so, at the risk of the common man.
Post a Comment